- Generation 2004 - https://generation2004.eu -

EPSO’s Path to Recovery: A New Era for EU Competitions? 

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO [1]) is undergoing its most radical transformation [2] yet, introducing a new model aimed at better respond[ing]  to the evolving needs of the EU institutions and the realities of today’s labour market [3]. Following sustained criticism [4] (including from the Ombudsman [5] and the European Data Protection Supervisor [6]) – ranging from outdated IT infrastructure, lack of transparency to excessive delays in competitions – EPSO is implementing a revamped selection process known as EPSOlution [7]. May 2025 will be the end of the five-year roadmap [8] set out in the EPSO magement plan. 

What started as a promising effort to streamline selection has quickly turned into a situation reminiscent of when EPSOnic [4]” hit the iceberg, leaving candidates and staff asking: Is this really a solution or just rearranging the deckchairs on a sinking ship? 

Lessons from the Past: What Went Wrong? 

EPSO’s history is riddled with operational challenges, with the most notable issues arising from: 


Key Reforms: EPSOlution – Real Change or Window Dressing? 

EPSO has branded its transformation as EPSOlution, promising to modernise selection processes without losing sight of quality.[1] But how much of this is a real reform, and how much is simply putting a new label on old problems? 

A Shorter, Leaner Selection Process 

More Inclusive and Modern Testing System 

Remote-Invigilated Testing: Innovation or Disaster? 

Remote-invigilated tests are here to stay, despite past complaints relating to an unequal access to quality living spaces and hardware and high retesting rates. While it offers cost savings and aligns with the Commission’s “greening” initiatives, it also raises serious concerns about fairness and accessibility. The Ombudsman’s [5] recent investigation highlighted how EPSO mishandled complaints during remote testing, calling it maladministration. 

Candidates can be excluded from a test after revision of the recording of that test, meaning that you have no chance to correct any perceived failing the moment it is pointed out. Some candidates have been exluded on the basis that they used a second screen during testing, something they deny, they now have difficulties to find someone able to respond to their request for evidence. If you have a similar story, please let us know [15] how you’re getting on.

What’s Next? 

The stakes are high for EPSO’s future. The upcoming competitions will serve as a litmus test for these reforms. Candidates, institutions, member states and staff representatives will be watching closely to see whether EPSOlution can deliver on its promise of a faster, fairer, and more efficient selection process – or become another chapter in EPSO’s troubled history. We are watching for the next EPSO magement plan five-year roadmap [8], to see what lessons have been learned and what’s been put in place to avoid any repetition.

Interested in preparing for the changed competitions? Join our EPSO training sessions! Click here [16] to learn more and register. 

Upcoming EPSO Competitions 

EPSO has announced its as-yet-incomplete 2025 competition calendar [17], which is intended to include the following, though they are not yet present: 

In other news, we encourage you to check out the new internal competitions which will be cross-function group [21]. Check what you’re eligible for!

Vote for transparency. Vote for fairness. Vote Generation 2004!  


[1] ‘Emergency plan to tackle backlog of competitions, competition model, competition flow and management, strategic planning, competency framework, attractiveness of EU career and IT infrastructure.’ EPSOlution [7].