You are a Contract Agent? Share your experience with us!

“In a Union of equals, there can be no second class workers. Workers should earn the same pay for the same work in the same place.” J.C. Juncker, State of the Union address, 13 September 2017.

Contract Agents account for more than a quarter of the European Institution’s population and are increasingly the victims of budgetary restrictions. Limited access to decent employment opportunities in the Institutions, insufficient job security and unfair working conditions are now well documented.

However, what is less documented is that there is a growing gap between the duties performed by CAs and their functional group. Continue reading You are a Contract Agent? Share your experience with us!

Wind in our sails, but in what condition is our ship?

A wind of optimism is blowing in the EU institutions. Some are beginning to argue that the added-value of the EU has become clearer following the events of the past 18 months. Indeed, recent electoral rounds in France and in the Netherlands have been less negative than expected with respect to the future of the EU. The outcome of the elections in Germany is perceived by some observers as less encouraging. However, it is clear that the eurosceptics will not prevail there any time soon. Unfortunately, the main issues that affect the staff are still very unclear and may be affected by a number of events.

Obviously colleagues who happen to be British citizen are worried by the lack of clarity on their future. The only consolation at the moment is that the Belgian authorities are beginning to realise that EU officials of UK citizenship need assistance. The Brussels Commissioner (not one of our Commissioners but an official appointed by the Brussels region to provide administrative assistance to the expat community in Brussels) organised an info session last June and provides some advice on its website. It is useful to go through this advice if you are a UK citizen working in Brussels. Continue reading Wind in our sails, but in what condition is our ship?

A new scheme to bypass the open competitions?

DG HR is cooking up a new scheme to allow some privileged few to get into the EU public service without passing an open competition. Their bright idea is that 15 Blue Book trainees (BBT), after their 5 months period, would have the chance to join a programme called Young Professionals Programme (YPP) [1]. The timeline would be approximately as follows:

  • The BBTs get a 1-year contract as a contract agent (CA) in function group (GF)IV in the same directorate general (DG) where they did their placement (in French ‘stage’). Evaluation 1.
  • Then, 1-year CA GFIV in a second DG. Evaluation 2.
  • Then, 1-year as a temporary agent (TA) AD5 either in the same second DG or seconded to an international organisation or a Member State (MS). Evaluation 3.
  • Final stage: internal competition to become official at the lowest grade: AD5.

There are two rounds of selection of BBTs per year, thus the new scheme could allow 30 BBTs per year to join the YPP). These 30 winners would have been selected out of an average of 16,000 applicants per selection round, i.e. more than 30,000 applicants/year. Interestingly, no prior work experience would be required to enter the scheme. CA3bs will appreciate…

We have several questions about this scheme:

Indeed, the staff regulations lay down two main competition paths, internal and open.  It is not clear at this stage which of the two legal bases would be applied by DG HR. What we can say is that:

  1. Open has to be: OPEN!
  1. In theory internal competitions are allowed only on an exceptional basis. Hard to reconcile this point with the fact that BBTs are recruited twice every year and thus with the fact that the YPP scheme would have to be run on a permanent basis.
  1. Interestingly, if the process is organised via an internal competition, the selected BBTs could become permanent officials with no more than 24-30 months of experience, as compared to the 42 months experience that CA/TA/FONC had to have last year to be allowed to participate in the internal competition. Of course, if you are already a CA or an AST, you won’t be allowed to become BBT to enter the scheme!
  1. So far, there is no information whatsoever about evaluation criteria, about which budget would pay for this, what the legal basis would be, whether the successful internal competition candidates would have to apply to a post like everybody else (or would also enjoy a priority lane over open competition laureates).

Because of the present lack of clarity, it is hard to make up our mind at this stage. However, what we can immediately see is the link between this proposal and the plea of CA3bs (see petition above). If DG HR can cook up something for the BBTs, maybe it can also do so for the CA3bs who are reaching the 6-year cliff edge with their contract?


[1] Now the Junior Professionals Programme (JPP), which had 9 ‘pilot’ tests before being made permanent in 2023. Check out our articles on this project.

Promotions: why are some years good and some other years bad?

You might have been promoted this year, or not promoted… We have argued many times that the current promotion system is flawed but why is there so much uncertainty in the system? Part of the explanation lies in the so-called “wave effect”. Basically, if you are in a grade with increasing population, for instance because of the arrival of a wave of colleagues promoted from the grade below, the mathematical peculiarities of Annex IB of the staff regulations result in a temporary increase in the quota of promotions available for that grade (see Annex 1 below for a theoretical example). Conversely, if you are in a grade with decreasing population, there will at some stage be a temporary decrease in the quota of promotions available for your grade. As a result, if you are lucky to be in “growing” grade, you might be promoted quickly just because “you are riding the front of the wave”. If you are in a “shrinking” grade, you might have to wait longer than normal to get your promotion just because you are “floating” on the “tail of the wave”. Continue reading Promotions: why are some years good and some other years bad?

Pensions and Brexit

Generation 2004 regularly alerts the staff with respect to the sustainability of our pension scheme [1]. Commissioner Oettinger seems to agree with us (“He therefore recommended a rigorous [budgetary] approach, particularly as there would be a considerable increase in the cost of EU officials’ pensions in the coming years“, see middle of page 14 in the Minutes of the last meeting of the College in May). Some more reasons to worry according to an article in The Guardian: an “EU diplomat” is quoted as saying “we cannot trade pensions for the MFF” [during the Brexit negotiations]. Let us hope that this diplomat really means what (s)he said. The fact that the Brexit Task Force has so far not bothered informing the staff about what is in preparation with respect to the employees of the institutions, not even those who have British origins, almost a year after the Brexit referendum, is not a good sign. The article in The Guardian emphasises that the EU has promised transparency, as opposed to the UK negotiators who apparently want secrecy. We have some doubts about this transparency pledge by the EU, see top of page 4 of our May newsletter. Continue reading Pensions and Brexit

Social Dialogue on “External Activities”

Update 21.02.2022: Check out the rules as they stand in 2022.

The Commission is currently revising its implementing rules on so-called “external activities”. These rules are meant to prevent conflicts of interest, either real or perceived, when active or former EU officials take on jobs or other duties outside of the institutions. Generation 2004 has been the most vocal staff organisation during the negotiations to denounce the fact that the rules proposed by the Commission make no distinctions between staff categories and between precarious staff and permanent staff: whether you are a former Director General looking for activities to keep yourself busy during retirement or a CA3b who is being kicked-out of the Institutions because your contract has reached the 6-year cliff makes no difference in DG HR’s mind. Continue reading social dialogue on “External Activities”

Petition on the future of Contract Agents

The NPS forum, with the active support of one of our members, is launching a petition on employment conditions and career prospects for the non-permanent employees and contractual agents at the European institutions. Follow this link to read the text of Petition 0178/2017. We encourage you to sign this petition, whether you are a permanent employee or not. Indeed, Generation 2004 thinks that non-permanent staff deserve a break after many years of austerity, just like non-permanent government employees in Spain.

If you don’t yet have a login on the European Parliament’s petition website, you will need to create one. This will take only a minute, just click on “register” at the bottom of the petition text. A small effort for a great cause! Once you have logged in, all you need to do is click on “support this petition”. Continue reading Petition on the future of Contract Agents

The Senior Expert against the Contract Agent

Les fonctionnaires sont un petit peu comme les livres d’une bibliothèque. Ce sont les plus hauts placés qui servent le moins…”  (Georges Clemenceau)

Recently, the staff representation has become very excited about a controversial email exchange between an informal collective of the European Commission’s Contract Agents called the Non-Permanent Staff (NPS) Forum, and some prominent staff representatives. Most of you probably don’t care, but it is nonetheless worth spending 5 minutes to understand what’s going on. To summarize crudely: the NPS forum, in its February newsletter accuses the staff representation of using their position to advance their own careers at the expense of the defence of the precarious Contract Agents (Quote: “…unions … do more damage than good, to all staff recruited after 2004, using public money and entertaining a friendly relation amongst themselves and particularly with some members of DG HR, for decades. We have … proof of the existing conflicts of interest, …. We also need to see who they are, before and after elections, we need to see their real CVs made public.”). Continue reading The Senior Expert against the Contract Agent